Bringing Diversity Data to Life: a Review of our First Panel Discussion on Diversity

  • What does this data mean for cultural communities and the broader Canadian society?
  • What does the data tell us still needs to be done to shape public policy to address social justice issues, equity and fairness, diversity, inclusion, gender, and identity?
  • How do these findings impact the lived experiences of individuals in cultural communities, particularly in relation to inclusion and gender identity?
  • What data is still needed by cultural communities to address cultural communities’ perspectives on data which will make the difference?

The event highlighted gaps in services and policies, but it also emphasized the need for the data to be accessible to the everyday person in an understandable format because at the end of the day, cultural communities will ask “Why should we pay attention to this data?”

Case in point. Before attending this event, I was unaware that this data is available on Statistics Canada’s website. In addition, without the interpretation of this data through the lens of lived experience, the data was basically meaningless to me. Yes, I understood the data, but like many immigrants coming from very different political and social systems, I missed seeing the impact on policies, funding, and our education system.

For example, a couple of the statistics pointed out that between 2016 and 2021, there were 1.3 million new immigrants who came to Canada. As of 2021, close to a quarter of Canada’s population were new immigrants at some point in their lives and almost 20% of Manitobans were immigrants.

Let’s break that down in terms of community impact.

Where do people tend to immigrate to?

  1. Where there are economic opportunities, which is one Canada’s three criteria for immigration selection.
  2. Where there is a community from home/birth countries.
  3. Where infrastructure and supports are in place to help them settle into their new lives.

Currently, there is a massive push to recruit immigrants in the nursing field to fill the shortage in the healthcare sector. New immigrants bring their families with them fulfilling another of Canada’s immigration selection criteria – family reunification which includes young children and grandparents.

What the statistics shows is an urgent need for supporting structures to assist this new wave of immigrants through language and other barriers.

One of the panelists shared their family’s experience in moving to Canada and highlighted what the statistics meant to their family. Their family moved here when Canada was recruiting women in the field of engineering. When they arrived in Canada, the job wasn’t available yet for their mother. Instead, their mother had to retrain and work in another profession for several years before finally being able to work in engineering.

If that story sounds familiar, it should. How many professionals in medicine or engineering, or other areas immigrate to Canada and end up working as cab drivers, or as support workers because infrastructure and policies have yet to catch up to the numbers that immigration is pushing for?

Through the event’s discussions, some of the gaps identified are being fulfilled by cultural communities for various reasons including, lack of formal organizational support driven by policies and funding. Compounding this are the difficulties communities already face to address challenges like gender roles, mental health, domestic abuse and gender-based violence, or legal matters among others. This in turn impacts how and where funding for programs gets directed.

The event was both eye-opening and a learning experience for participants and CMCCF. I believe that more engagement from the community will come from directing attention to lived experiences that put a face to the numbers. I look forward to seeing this reflected in the next panel discussion on March 21, 2023.

This article was written by community writer Tsungai Muvingi as part of our J.E.D.I. Initiative – Community Writers Project. All thoughts and opinions expressed are Tsungai’s own. You can learn more about Tsungai on our team page here.

To learn more about our Intercultural and Intergenerational Diversity and Inclusion Engagement Project, go to our J.E.D.I. Initiative landing page here.

Comments are closed.

Purpose

The Purpose of These Peace-First: CollaborationNet Pages These pages exist to share what we have learned. Over the past year, Peace-First: CollaborationNet has operated as a time-limited demonstration initiative, which is a space to test ideas, host conversations, and discover what might grow when peace is placed at the center. Conversations took root in informal Peace-First Hubs across Winnipeg, Thompson, Brandon, and Portage la Prairie, with related gatherings in Vancouver and Toronto. Toronto now helps convene national roundtable conversations, linking local dialogue with a broader Canadian exchange. What began as small, local discussions has become more connected — not through expansion or centralization, but through coherence. Across regions, shared themes, tensions, and hopes are emerging. This webpage documents that journey. It gathers reflections, materials, and learning from Hub conversations so others can understand what has been explored and carry it forward. From the beginning, Peace-First was designed as a seed-planting initiative, formally concluding March 31, 2026. Its focus has been to explore how individuals and cultural communities understand inner peace, collective vision, community cohesion, and cultural dignity and visibility. The Hubs are volunteer-led spaces where community connectors and members gather to listen, reflect, and imagine what a peaceful geographic and cultural community might look like in practice. Along the way, we developed background papers, reflection documents, and practical toolkits shaped by lived experience in Manitoba and beyond. This page now serves as a living repository within the Peace-First Library, offering capacity-building tools, framing papers, hub guidance, and shared learning that communities can adapt to their own realities. The purpose is not to centralize authority, but to make learning accessible. Peace-First Hubs are community-led and partner-supported — grounded in relationship, not hierarchy. Supported by ACOMI, ECCM, Palaver Hut, MIA, cultural community members across the country, and allies such as MANSO, Mediation Services, CanU Canada, and PCHS, this work moves through partnership rather than control. This initiative has been made possible through the principal financial support of the Department of Canadian Heritage, with a supportive role played by The Winnipeg Foundation. Their investment has allowed these conversations, materials, and connections to take shape. These materials are not instructions to replicate. They are tools to adapt. This page is more than documentation. It is an invitation. Peace-First is not about imposing a uniform model. It is about strengthening conditions for dialogue, cohesion, and shared responsibility before a crisis. If this resonates, we invite you to explore further, join a national roundtable call, or consider what it would mean to host or support a conversation in your own community. Join a national roundtable call. Complete the survey. The seeds have been planted. What grows next depends on all of us.

Other Videos